Methodology
How this data is built
Tokenmeter is an independent reference. We are not a provider, not a reseller, and take no placement fees — listings are editorial. This page states exactly where each figure comes from and how much to trust it. Dataset v1.0.0, last reviewed 2026-07-10.
Confidence legend
Every figure carries a confidence level. Nothing here should be quoted as first-party fact unless marked high.
Figure confirmed against the provider's public pricing/docs page on the last_reviewed date.
7 providersFigure based on public sources but not re-confirmed on the exact review date; may drift.
12 providersIllustrative seed value pending first-party verification. NOT to be quoted as fact.
1 providersPricing
Blended prices are approximate USD per 1M tokens for a representative open model where the provider hosts one; proprietary-only providers list a flagship model instead. Latency figures are order-of-magnitude reference points, not SLAs.
The Blended $/1M column is a simple arithmetic mean of the input and output per-million-token prices for each provider's reference model — a rough comparison anchor, not a bill estimate. Real cost depends on your input/output ratio, caching, batching, committed-use discounts and model choice. Where a provider bills by GPU-time rather than per token, the price is shown as — rather than a fabricated number.
Latency & throughput
TTFT ms (time-to-first-token) and tok/s (sustained output throughput) are order-of-magnitude reference points for a representative open model under nominal load —not SLAs and not a live benchmark. They move with model size, prompt length, region, quantization and congestion. Treat them as "which tier of fast," not exact numbers. Uptime is a reference figure, not a contractual guarantee.
Reputation composite index
reputation.score is an editorial composite index (0-100), not a first-party metric. See each site's Methodology page for the weighting model.
The 0–100 reputation score is editorial. It is a weighted composite of public signals — developer sentiment, documentation quality, track record and operational reliability — and is not a survey, not audited, and not provided by the vendors. The reviews count is the number of weighted signals behind the score, and the trend arrow is a 90-day direction. On provider pages we also normalize it to a 0–5 scale for schema.org AggregateRating; that normalization is mechanical and does not add precision.
Independence & neutrality
- No provider pays for inclusion, ranking or a badge.
- Ordering defaults to alphabetical or to the column you sort by — there is no house favorite.
- Every provider — including any we might have a relationship with — is held to the same schema and the same confidence rules.
- Corrections are welcome; figures are re-reviewed against public sources on each dated review.
Per-provider confidence
The overall confidence flag for each listing, so nothing reads as settled fact:
| Provider | Overall confidence | Price confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic | high | medium |
| Baseten | medium | seed |
| Cerebras Inference | medium | seed |
| cheapestinference | seed | seed |
| DeepInfra | high | medium |
| Fireworks AI | high | medium |
| Google Vertex AI | medium | seed |
| Groq | high | medium |
| Hyperbolic | medium | seed |
| Lepton AI | medium | seed |
| Mistral La Plateforme | medium | seed |
| Modal | medium | seed |
| Nebius AI Studio | medium | seed |
| Novita AI | medium | seed |
| OpenAI | high | medium |
| OpenRouter | high | medium |
| Perplexity API | medium | seed |
| Replicate | medium | seed |
| SambaNova Cloud | medium | seed |
| Together AI | high | medium |